Monday - Friday 9AM – 6PM EST
Give a committee the evidence it needs to predict how an applicant will do. Build your letter of recommendation for graduate school in minutes with Document Genius's step-by-step questionnaire.
Choose the state or form type you need to start.
Answer a few simple questions to customize your form.
Download or print your custom document in PDF or Word.
A letter of recommendation for graduate school is a written assessment of an applicant’s readiness for advanced study, sent to admissions committees as part of their application. It describes how you know the applicant and what you have seen of their work.
Graduate committees read these differently from undergraduate letters. They are trying to predict whether someone can work independently, handle sustained difficulty, and contribute to a field, so they weigh evidence of research and analytical ability heavily.
Faculty write most of these. Research supervisors, thesis advisors, and employers in a relevant field are also common, and a strong letter from someone who supervised real work usually beats a warm one from a famous name who taught a large lecture.
Applicants should choose people who have watched them do difficult work, not simply those who gave them good grades. The strongest writers tend to be:
Applicants should ask early and ask directly whether the writer can produce a strong letter. A writer given the chance to decline gracefully is doing the applicant a favour by taking it.
Most programmes ask for three letters and specify how many must come from academic sources. Read each programme’s instructions, because a professional letter submitted where an academic one was required can leave an application incomplete.
A letter of recommendation for graduate school usually runs longer than an undergraduate one, though one to two pages is still the norm.
Open with your name, title, department, institution, and contact information.
Say in what capacity and over what period. Name the courses, the project, or the lab, and say how closely you supervised the work.
This is the section committees read most carefully. Describe a specific problem the applicant tackled, the approach they took, and what they produced.
Graduate work is largely unsupervised. Give an example of the applicant driving something forward without being managed.
Comment on how they write and how they present. Both matter enormously in graduate study and are easy to assess.
Place the applicant against a defined group: students you have supervised, previous cohorts, or others who went on to graduate programmes. Say what the comparison is based on.
If you know the field, note why this applicant suits this kind of programme.
Close with a clear recommendation and an offer to speak further. Committees do occasionally follow up, so give a contact route you will actually monitor during the review season.
Admissions committees are making a prediction, not awarding a prize. They want to know whether this person will finish, and whether they will be worth supervising.
That shifts what counts as evidence. A student who produced adequate work under close direction reads differently from one who identified a question, chose a method, and pushed through when the first approach failed. Describe the second kind of behaviour wherever you have seen it.
Length signals investment, within reason. A committee reading a detailed two-page letter infers that the writer knew the applicant well enough to fill it, while a short generic note suggests the opposite even when the words are complimentary.
Specific weaknesses handled honestly can strengthen a letter. Noting that an applicant started slowly and then improved sharply is more credible than uniform praise, and committees are experienced at spotting letters that avoid every difficulty.
Tip: Avoid vague superlatives. Saying someone is one of the best students you have taught means little on its own, while naming the comparison group and the period it covers gives a committee something it can actually use.
A letter of recommendation for graduate school takes real time to do well. Document Genius walks you through each section with simple questions.
Ask for their statement of purpose, CV, transcript, the programmes they are applying to, and the work you supervised.
Each programme collects letters separately, often through its own system. List the dates before you begin.
Open with who you are and exactly how closely you have worked with the applicant.
Describe one substantial piece of work in detail rather than summarizing everything they did.
Give the comparison group and where the applicant sits within it.
Tailor the closing line where the programme differs, then submit through each portal. Start yours now and have it ready before the first deadline.
The emphasis shifts depending on what the applicant is applying to, and a letter that ignores the difference reads as generic.
For a research doctorate, weight everything toward research capability: independence, methodological judgement, and tolerance for long projects that stall. Committees are choosing someone to supervise for years.
For a taught master’s, coursework performance, discipline, and preparation for the subject matter more. Evidence of research potential helps but is not the centre of the case.
For professional programmes, judgement, ethics, and how the applicant works with people carry real weight alongside academic ability. Describe how they behaved under pressure and how they treated colleagues.
If the applicant is applying across several of these, ask which programme each letter is going to and adjust the closing paragraph rather than sending one letter everywhere. Committees notice when a letter was clearly written for a different kind of programme, and it undercuts everything else in it.
One place to build, sign, and manage documents.
